Capability and practice
The team may need applied learning or coaching: practical work on its own files, so people can apply the rules and methods with confidence.
As suas escolhas ficam guardadas neste dispositivo. Concebido segundo as WCAG 2.2 AA · teclado: Tab para avançar, Esc para fechar. Leia a nossa declaração de acessibilidade.
Prima / para pesquisar a partir de qualquer página · Esc para fechar
Início › Ferramentas gratuitas › Avaliação para Criadores de Conteúdos
Para criadores, equipas de comunicação e organizações que publicam nas redes sociais. Responda a 27 perguntas curtas sobre a forma como planeia, cria, partilha e mede os conteúdos. Obtém uma pontuação em nove áreas, as três que mais o travam, conselhos práticos para o seu nível em cada área e um plano a 90 dias.
Finish to see how you compare with other professionals, then challenge a colleague to beat your score.
Precisa de um resultado verificado? Peça uma avaliação independente à Risalat.
Próximos programas cujo conteúdo corresponde às áreas que esta ferramenta avalia. Os seus resultados mostram quais se ajustam às suas áreas mais fracas.
Não encontra aqui a resposta exata à sua necessidade? Peça um programa interno construído em torno das suas lacunas ou consulte todos os programas.
Criadores individuais, equipas de comunicação e organizações que publicam conteúdos nas redes sociais, de ONG e organismos públicos a pequenas empresas.
Nenhuma ferramenta pode prometer alcance. Uma pontuação elevada significa que a sua prática segue o que normalmente funciona: um público claro, inícios fortes, um ritmo constante, adequação às plataformas e aprendizagem a partir dos dados.
A cada três a seis meses, ou depois de mudar de estratégia, de equipa ou de plataformas. Compare as pontuações por área para ver a evolução.
Sim. Com uma conta gratuita, pode convidar colegas a responder às mesmas perguntas e ver onde as opiniões divergem.
Fontes verificadas: novembro de 2026. Verificamos as fontes oficiais todos os meses.
Update November 2026: The link no longer works (404). Replace it with the current official page. Source
Um auxiliar de planeamento e autoavaliação baseado em práticas de conteúdo amplamente utilizadas, não uma garantia de alcance ou de resultados. As regras e os algoritmos das plataformas mudam com frequência: consulte as orientações de cada plataforma.
We use essential cookies to run this website securely. With your permission we also use cookies to remember your choices and to measure our advertising. To understand how the site is used we count visits with Google Analytics: in the EU, the UK and Switzerland only after you accept, elsewhere unless you reject it. You can change your choice at any time from “Cookie settings” at the bottom of every page. Privacy and cookie policy
Most likely fit
Also worth a look
Less indicated by this result
Bid document issued
Bids opened
Evaluation and award decision
Contract signed
Bid validity
Bid document issued late in {n} package(s): preparing specifications, estimates and documents is a skill the team can build.
Bid document issued late in {n} package(s): check internal clearance and prior review timing as well.
Bid opening moved in {n} package(s): check how addenda, clarifications and deadline extensions are approved.
Evaluation and award decision late in {n} package(s): check committee appointment, report approval and no-objection steps.
Evaluation and award decision late in {n} package(s): evaluation reports may need practice with real cases.
Contract signature late in {n} package(s): check signature approvals, securities and other dependencies.
Long gaps between stages in {n} package(s): look for steps that wait on another unit.
{x} late in {n} packages: a recurring pattern often points to a practice gap.
Evaluation outlasted the bid validity in {n} package(s): confirm extensions and their effect on bids before any award.
More than half of the bid validity used in {n} package(s): plan extensions before the deadline.
Bid preparation period below the minimum in {n} package(s): an independent check before award is advisable.
Signature soon after the award decision in {n} package(s): confirm the standstill period was respected.
{x}: {n}%
Matched from the type of tool, as this result has no scores by area.
Nothing in this result points here.
No clear gap in this result. If problems persist, a short conversation helps locate them.
Overall result: {n}%
Lowest areas: {x}
{n} package(s) analysed, {x} behind plan
{x}: late in {n} package(s)
Bid validity and rule flags: {n}
Score: {x}
Result: {x}
Please complete the highlighted fields.
Connection problem. Please try again.
Sending…
A work email helps us confirm your institution and reply faster. A personal address is accepted.
See your result ↓
Back to questions ↑
A late stage or a low score shows where time or quality is being lost. It does not, on its own, show why. The cards below suggest which kind of support is most likely to fit, so a first conversation starts in the right place.
The team may need applied learning or coaching: practical work on its own files, so people can apply the rules and methods with confidence.
The institution may need to review its steps, approvals and dependencies: who signs, in what order, how long each step takes and what waits on what.
Dates, deadlines or validity periods are under pressure. A verified independent assessment is advisable before acting, so decisions rest on confirmed facts.
Screening aid, not a verified assessment. The matching uses your answers and a few fixed rules. Our specialists confirm the cause with you before recommending anything.
A confirmation is on its way to your inbox.
The Risalat Brief: one short report a week on a real delivery problem in procurement, safeguards, M&E or public finance, its causes and what works. No adverts; unsubscribe any time.
Ao subscrever, aceita receber a nossa newsletter. Política de privacidade