Capability and practice
The team may need applied learning or coaching: practical work on its own files, so people can apply the rules and methods with confidence.
Vos choix sont mémorisés sur cet appareil. Conçu selon les WCAG 2.2 AA · clavier : Tab pour naviguer, Échap pour fermer. Consultez notre déclaration d'accessibilité.
Appuyez sur / pour rechercher depuis n'importe quelle page · Échap pour fermer
Accueil › Outils gratuits › Évaluation du créateur de contenu
Pour les créateurs, les équipes de communication et les organisations qui publient sur les réseaux sociaux. Répondez à 27 questions courtes sur la façon dont vous planifiez, réalisez, diffusez et mesurez vos contenus. Vous obtenez un score dans neuf domaines, les trois qui vous freinent le plus, des conseils pratiques adaptés à votre niveau dans chaque domaine et un plan sur 90 jours.
Finish to see how you compare with other professionals, then challenge a colleague to beat your score.
Besoin d'un résultat vérifié ? Demandez une évaluation indépendante par Risalat.
Programmes à venir dont le contenu correspond aux domaines mesurés par cet outil. Vos résultats indiquent ceux qui ciblent vos points les plus faibles.
Rien ne correspond exactement à votre besoin ? Demandez un programme intra construit autour de vos lacunes, ou parcourez tous les programmes.
Créateurs individuels, équipes de communication et organisations qui publient du contenu sur les réseaux sociaux, des ONG et organismes publics aux petites entreprises.
Aucun outil ne peut garantir la portée. Un score élevé signifie que votre pratique suit ce qui fonctionne habituellement : une audience claire, des accroches fortes, un rythme régulier, une adéquation aux plateformes et un apprentissage fondé sur les données.
Tous les trois à six mois, ou après un changement de stratégie, d'équipe ou de plateformes. Comparez les scores par domaine pour mesurer les progrès.
Oui. Avec un compte gratuit, vous pouvez inviter vos collègues à répondre aux mêmes questions et voir où les avis divergent.
Sources vérifiées : novembre 2026. Nous vérifions les sources officielles chaque mois.
Update November 2026: The link no longer works (404). Replace it with the current official page. Source
Une aide à la planification et à l'autoévaluation fondée sur des pratiques de contenu largement répandues, et non une garantie de portée ou de résultats. Les règles et les algorithmes des plateformes changent souvent : consultez les recommandations propres à chaque plateforme.
We use essential cookies to run this website securely. With your permission we also use cookies to remember your choices and to measure our advertising. To understand how the site is used we count visits with Google Analytics: in the EU, the UK and Switzerland only after you accept, elsewhere unless you reject it. You can change your choice at any time from “Cookie settings” at the bottom of every page. Privacy and cookie policy
Most likely fit
Also worth a look
Less indicated by this result
Bid document issued
Bids opened
Evaluation and award decision
Contract signed
Bid validity
Bid document issued late in {n} package(s): preparing specifications, estimates and documents is a skill the team can build.
Bid document issued late in {n} package(s): check internal clearance and prior review timing as well.
Bid opening moved in {n} package(s): check how addenda, clarifications and deadline extensions are approved.
Evaluation and award decision late in {n} package(s): check committee appointment, report approval and no-objection steps.
Evaluation and award decision late in {n} package(s): evaluation reports may need practice with real cases.
Contract signature late in {n} package(s): check signature approvals, securities and other dependencies.
Long gaps between stages in {n} package(s): look for steps that wait on another unit.
{x} late in {n} packages: a recurring pattern often points to a practice gap.
Evaluation outlasted the bid validity in {n} package(s): confirm extensions and their effect on bids before any award.
More than half of the bid validity used in {n} package(s): plan extensions before the deadline.
Bid preparation period below the minimum in {n} package(s): an independent check before award is advisable.
Signature soon after the award decision in {n} package(s): confirm the standstill period was respected.
{x}: {n}%
Matched from the type of tool, as this result has no scores by area.
Nothing in this result points here.
No clear gap in this result. If problems persist, a short conversation helps locate them.
Overall result: {n}%
Lowest areas: {x}
{n} package(s) analysed, {x} behind plan
{x}: late in {n} package(s)
Bid validity and rule flags: {n}
Score: {x}
Result: {x}
Please complete the highlighted fields.
Connection problem. Please try again.
Sending…
A work email helps us confirm your institution and reply faster. A personal address is accepted.
See your result ↓
Back to questions ↑
A late stage or a low score shows where time or quality is being lost. It does not, on its own, show why. The cards below suggest which kind of support is most likely to fit, so a first conversation starts in the right place.
The team may need applied learning or coaching: practical work on its own files, so people can apply the rules and methods with confidence.
The institution may need to review its steps, approvals and dependencies: who signs, in what order, how long each step takes and what waits on what.
Dates, deadlines or validity periods are under pressure. A verified independent assessment is advisable before acting, so decisions rest on confirmed facts.
Screening aid, not a verified assessment. The matching uses your answers and a few fixed rules. Our specialists confirm the cause with you before recommending anything.
A confirmation is on its way to your inbox.
The Risalat Brief: one short report a week on a real delivery problem in procurement, safeguards, M&E or public finance, its causes and what works. No adverts; unsubscribe any time.
En vous abonnant, vous acceptez de recevoir notre newsletter. Politique de confidentialité