Skip to content
Talk to us →
Free toolsCV, LinkedIn, logframe, audit checklist, 7 diagnostics · no sign-upFree
AboutOverviewAbout RisalatClients and partnersPortfolioTestimonialsVideo galleryCareersLife at RisalatBecome an ambassador
ProgrammesOverviewProgramme categoriesProgrammes by cityGlobal learning programmesIn-house programmesOnline programmes
SolutionsOverviewCapacity buildingBusiness servicesSurvey and researchEvent managementBusiness registrationIndustries
ToolsFreeOverviewOrganisation diagnosticsCapacity Development PlannerProcurement Delay AnalyserPIU Implementation ReadinessCV DesignerLinkedIn Profile AdviserLogframe BuilderAudit Readiness ChecklistCertification preparationDay PlannerAll free toolsRegulation readiness · NewEU AI ActE&S standardsProcurement rules 2025/26Climate finance proposalsParis alignmentData protection
InsightsOverviewAI and data in governmentClimate financePublic procurementMonitoring and evaluationProject managementLeadership
ContactContact usFAQsRequest an invoiceRequest a proposal
Talk to us →Sign in / create account
Risalat Diagnostic Centre · Free self-assessment

M&E and MEAL Assessment

How strong is your monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning system? Check your results framework, data, reporting, accountability and learning practices.

For: Project and program teams, M&E officers and PIUs30 questions · 6 areasAbout 10 minutesNo sign-up · answers stay on your device
01Answer honestlyThink about how things actually work today, not the manual.
02Watch your resultsScores and risks update as you answer.
03Review prioritiesSee which areas need attention first.
04Save & sharePrint or save the results as PDF for your team.

Jump to my results ↓

01

Results Framework

Is it clear what success looks like and how it is measured?

1.1A theory of change explains how activities lead to results.
1.2A results framework or logframe defines indicators at each level.
1.3Baselines are established for key indicators.
1.4Targets are realistic and time-bound.
1.5Each indicator has a reference sheet with definition and method.
02

Data Collection & Quality

Is data reliable and well managed?

2.1A data collection plan sets sources, frequency and responsibilities.
2.2Data collection tools are standardized.
2.3Data quality is checked regularly.
2.4Data is disaggregated (e.g. by sex, age, location).
2.5Data is stored securely and backed up.
03

Analysis & Reporting

Is data turned into timely, useful reporting?

3.1Data is analyzed regularly, not only at reporting time.
3.2Reports are submitted on time.
3.3Findings are presented clearly with charts and tables.
3.4Reports meet funder and government requirements.
3.5Findings are shared with partners and stakeholders.
04

Accountability to Stakeholders

Do beneficiaries and communities have a voice?

4.1A feedback and complaints mechanism is in place.
4.2Communities are informed about the project and their rights.
4.3Feedback is acted on and responses are communicated.
4.4Stakeholders take part in monitoring and review.
4.5Accountability data is reported to management.
05

Evaluation & Learning

Are evaluations used and lessons applied?

5.1Evaluations (e.g. mid-term, final) are planned and budgeted.
5.2Evaluation recommendations are tracked to completion.
5.3Learning reviews are held regularly.
5.4Plans are adapted based on evidence.
5.5Lessons are documented and shared.
06

M&E Capacity & Systems

Does the team have the people, budget and tools for M&E?

6.1Dedicated M&E staff are in place.
6.2M&E has an adequate budget.
6.3A database or MIS stores M&E data.
6.4M&E staff and data collectors are trained.
6.5An M&E plan defines roles, timelines and tools.

Recommended support

Areas marked Priority (two or more answers of “Not at all” or “Partly”) are highlighted below.

Priority

Results Framework

Results frameworks, theories of change and indicators.

M&E & Performance Management programmes →
Priority

Data Collection & Quality

Data collection, surveys and data quality.

Research & Statistics programmes →Data Science & Excel Modelling programmes →
Priority

Analysis & Reporting

Data analysis, visualization and reporting.

Data Science & Excel Modelling programmes →M&E & Performance Management programmes →
Priority

Accountability to Stakeholders

Accountability, feedback and community engagement.

Community Development programmes →M&E & Performance Management programmes →
Priority

Evaluation & Learning

Evaluation design and learning.

M&E & Performance Management programmes →Research & Statistics programmes →
Priority

M&E Capacity & Systems

M&E capacity, systems and tools.

M&E & Performance Management programmes →Data Science & Excel Modelling programmes →Start a Training Needs Assessment →

This is a self-assessment based on your own answers, a structured first read, not an audit, evaluation or certification. Your answers are not sent or stored anywhere; they stay in your browser and disappear when you leave the page. For an independent, evidence-based M&E system assessment with document review, interviews and a full report, Risalat can carry out a consultant-led review.

Need a deeper, independent assessment?

Risalat experts can run a consultant-led review with document analysis, interviews and a full report.

All diagnostic toolsTalk to an expert

How this diagnostic works

Scoring: each answer is scored on the scale shown; each area's score is the share of the maximum points, and areas below the threshold are flagged as priorities.

Limitations: answers are self-reported and not verified. This diagnostic does not replace MAPS, PEFA, World Bank or other formal assessment methodologies, or an independent review.

Need a verified result? Ask for an independent assessment by Risalat: our specialists review your evidence, interview your team and deliver a costed action plan. Scope and price on request.