Approach in Action
Environmental and Social Risk Management
ESF and safeguards that protect people and do not stop the works.
The problem we solve
Environmental and social requirements are often handled late: instruments are prepared after contracts start, compensation is delayed and grievances go unanswered, which stops works and harms people.
Our method, phase by phase
Gap review
- Review commitments, instruments and staffing
- Site visits and stakeholder interviews
- Check contractor documents
Instruments and plans
- Site-specific management plans
- Labour management and health and safety plans
- Stakeholder engagement and grievance mechanisms
Land and livelihoods
- Resettlement planning and compensation tracking
- Livelihood restoration measures
- Monitoring of affected households
Supervision and monitoring
- Inspection schedules and non-compliance logs
- Incident reporting
- Reports to the financier
Capability
- Training for project staff, contractors and supervisors
- Coaching specialists
- Templates and checklists
Try the instruments live
The same instruments we use with clients. Try them with your own organisation; your answers stay in your browser until you ask for the result.
What you receive
- A gap review against the standards
- Instruments ready before works
- Working grievance mechanisms
- Monitoring and reporting routines
- Trained staff and contractors
How we keep quality
- Methods and tools agreed with you at inception, then applied openly
- Every finding linked to its evidence
- Senior review of every deliverable before it reaches you
- Knowledge transfer: your team keeps the tools and routines
Reference frameworks: World Bank Environmental and Social Framework
Programmes that build this capacity
Evaluating a proposal from Risalat?
This page shows the method we would apply to your assignment. We will gladly walk your committee through it live, online, with your own questions and data.
Ask for a live walkthroughAll approaches