Capability and practice
The team may need applied learning or coaching: practical work on its own files, so people can apply the rules and methods with confidence.
Sus preferencias se guardan en este dispositivo. Diseñado conforme a WCAG 2.2 AA · teclado: Tab para desplazarse, Esc para cerrar. Lea nuestra declaración de accesibilidad.
Pulse / para buscar desde cualquier página · Esc para cerrar
Inicio › Herramientas gratuitas › Constructor de estrategias de lotificación de adquisiciones
La forma en que un programa se divide en contratos determina quién puede presentar ofertas, quién asume cada riesgo y cuántas interfaces debe gestionar el propietario. Enumere los principales elementos del alcance con su valor, tipo, estado del diseño, profundidad del mercado, interfaces e incertidumbre. El constructor propone un modelo de contrato (FIDIC u opción NEC4), un enfoque de mercado y recomendaciones de lotes para cada uno, señala los lotes demasiado grandes para el mercado o demasiado entrelazados, y propone los próximos pasos para su estrategia de adquisiciones.
¿Necesita un resultado verificado? Solicite una evaluación independiente a Risalat.
Próximos programas cuyo contenido coincide con las áreas que mide esta herramienta. Sus resultados muestran cuáles se ajustan a sus áreas más débiles.
¿No encuentra nada para su necesidad concreta? Solicite un programa interno diseñado en torno a sus brechas o explore todos los programas.
Determina quién puede presentar ofertas, cuánta competencia obtiene, quién asume cada riesgo y cuántas interfaces debe gestionar el propietario. Muchos sobrecostes en grandes programas empiezan con lotes demasiado grandes, demasiado pequeños o demasiado entrelazados.
Sugiere el enfoque habitual. Los métodos y umbrales permitidos en su proyecto se derivan de las normas del financiador y de su plan de adquisiciones.
Remedición con diseño del Contratante (FIDIC Rojo, NEC4 Opción B), diseño-construcción (FIDIC Amarillo, NEC4 Opción A), EPC/llave en mano (FIDIC Plateado), coste objetivo (NEC4 Opción C), suministro, sistemas de información, consultoría y O&M basados en el desempeño.
Fuentes verificadas: noviembre de 2026. Revisamos las fuentes oficiales cada mes.
Herramienta de orientación, no una evaluación formal, una auditoría ni un dictamen jurídico. Sus contratos, las políticas del financiador y la legislación nacional prevalecen siempre. Los métodos de adquisición, los umbrales y los documentos estándar permitidos en su proyecto los fijan el financiador y las normas nacionales.
We use essential cookies to run this website securely. With your permission we also use cookies to remember your choices and to measure our advertising. To understand how the site is used we count visits with Google Analytics: in the EU, the UK and Switzerland only after you accept, elsewhere unless you reject it. You can change your choice at any time from “Cookie settings” at the bottom of every page. Privacy and cookie policy
Most likely fit
Also worth a look
Less indicated by this result
Bid document issued
Bids opened
Evaluation and award decision
Contract signed
Bid validity
Bid document issued late in {n} package(s): preparing specifications, estimates and documents is a skill the team can build.
Bid document issued late in {n} package(s): check internal clearance and prior review timing as well.
Bid opening moved in {n} package(s): check how addenda, clarifications and deadline extensions are approved.
Evaluation and award decision late in {n} package(s): check committee appointment, report approval and no-objection steps.
Evaluation and award decision late in {n} package(s): evaluation reports may need practice with real cases.
Contract signature late in {n} package(s): check signature approvals, securities and other dependencies.
Long gaps between stages in {n} package(s): look for steps that wait on another unit.
{x} late in {n} packages: a recurring pattern often points to a practice gap.
Evaluation outlasted the bid validity in {n} package(s): confirm extensions and their effect on bids before any award.
More than half of the bid validity used in {n} package(s): plan extensions before the deadline.
Bid preparation period below the minimum in {n} package(s): an independent check before award is advisable.
Signature soon after the award decision in {n} package(s): confirm the standstill period was respected.
{x}: {n}%
Matched from the type of tool, as this result has no scores by area.
Nothing in this result points here.
No clear gap in this result. If problems persist, a short conversation helps locate them.
Overall result: {n}%
Lowest areas: {x}
{n} package(s) analysed, {x} behind plan
{x}: late in {n} package(s)
Bid validity and rule flags: {n}
Score: {x}
Result: {x}
Please complete the highlighted fields.
Connection problem. Please try again.
Sending…
A work email helps us confirm your institution and reply faster. A personal address is accepted.
See your result ↓
Back to questions ↑
A late stage or a low score shows where time or quality is being lost. It does not, on its own, show why. The cards below suggest which kind of support is most likely to fit, so a first conversation starts in the right place.
The team may need applied learning or coaching: practical work on its own files, so people can apply the rules and methods with confidence.
The institution may need to review its steps, approvals and dependencies: who signs, in what order, how long each step takes and what waits on what.
Dates, deadlines or validity periods are under pressure. A verified independent assessment is advisable before acting, so decisions rest on confirmed facts.
Screening aid, not a verified assessment. The matching uses your answers and a few fixed rules. Our specialists confirm the cause with you before recommending anything.
A confirmation is on its way to your inbox.
The Risalat Brief: one short report a week on a real delivery problem in procurement, safeguards, M&E or public finance, its causes and what works. No adverts; unsubscribe any time.
Al suscribirse, acepta recibir nuestro boletín. Política de privacidad