Capability and practice
The team may need applied learning or coaching: practical work on its own files, so people can apply the rules and methods with confidence.
Your choices are remembered on this device. Designed to WCAG 2.2 AA · keyboard: Tab to move, Esc to close. Read our accessibility statement.
Press / to search from any page · Esc to close
Home › Free tools › Digital Project and Data Protection Readiness Assessment
Donors are financing digital ID, social registries, payment systems and e-services at scale, and they expect the systems to be lawful, secure and inclusive. This assessment checks a digital project against GDPR-style data protection principles that most national laws now follow, the UN Universal DPI Safeguards Framework (September 2024), the World Bank Principles on Identification for Sustainable Development and basic cybersecurity practice. It complements our Data Governance Maturity Assessment, which looks at the whole organisation. This is a real readiness tool: each question is drawn from the current official texts listed under "Based on", and Risalat's guideline monitor re-checks those sources every two weeks so the questions follow new editions.
Need a verified result? Ask for an independent assessment by Risalat.
Upcoming programmes whose content matches the areas this tool measures. Your results show which fit your weakest areas.
Nothing here for your exact need? Ask for an in-house programme built around your gaps, or browse all programmes.
Usually not directly, unless you offer services to people in the EU or monitor them. But many national laws follow the same principles, and donors often expect equivalent protection.
Shared digital systems such as digital ID, payments and data exchange that governments and others use to deliver services at scale.
That tool looks at the whole organisation's data governance. This one focuses on a specific digital system or project and the safeguards a lender or regulator will review.
Before the design is final and before any personal data is collected, and again when the system changes significantly.
Sources checked: October 2026. We check the official sources every month.
This is a self-assessment and training tool, not legal advice or a security audit. Always follow your national data protection and cybersecurity laws and the requirements in your financing agreement.
We use essential cookies to run this website securely. With your permission we also use cookies to remember your choices, to understand how the site is used, and to measure our advertising. You can change your choice at any time from “Cookie settings” at the bottom of every page. Privacy and cookie policy
Most likely fit
Also worth a look
Less indicated by this result
Bid document issued
Bids opened
Evaluation and award decision
Contract signed
Bid validity
Bid document issued late in {n} package(s): preparing specifications, estimates and documents is a skill the team can build.
Bid document issued late in {n} package(s): check internal clearance and prior review timing as well.
Bid opening moved in {n} package(s): check how addenda, clarifications and deadline extensions are approved.
Evaluation and award decision late in {n} package(s): check committee appointment, report approval and no-objection steps.
Evaluation and award decision late in {n} package(s): evaluation reports may need practice with real cases.
Contract signature late in {n} package(s): check signature approvals, securities and other dependencies.
Long gaps between stages in {n} package(s): look for steps that wait on another unit.
{x} late in {n} packages: a recurring pattern often points to a practice gap.
Evaluation outlasted the bid validity in {n} package(s): confirm extensions and their effect on bids before any award.
More than half of the bid validity used in {n} package(s): plan extensions before the deadline.
Bid preparation period below the minimum in {n} package(s): an independent check before award is advisable.
Signature soon after the award decision in {n} package(s): confirm the standstill period was respected.
{x}: {n}%
Matched from the type of tool, as this result has no scores by area.
Nothing in this result points here.
No clear gap in this result. If problems persist, a short conversation helps locate them.
Overall result: {n}%
Lowest areas: {x}
{n} package(s) analysed, {x} behind plan
{x}: late in {n} package(s)
Bid validity and rule flags: {n}
Score: {x}
Result: {x}
Please complete the highlighted fields.
Connection problem. Please try again.
Sending…
A work email helps us confirm your institution and reply faster. A personal address is accepted.
See your result ↓
Back to questions ↑
A late stage or a low score shows where time or quality is being lost. It does not, on its own, show why. The cards below suggest which kind of support is most likely to fit, so a first conversation starts in the right place.
The team may need applied learning or coaching: practical work on its own files, so people can apply the rules and methods with confidence.
The institution may need to review its steps, approvals and dependencies: who signs, in what order, how long each step takes and what waits on what.
Dates, deadlines or validity periods are under pressure. A verified independent assessment is advisable before acting, so decisions rest on confirmed facts.
Screening aid, not a verified assessment. The matching uses your answers and a few fixed rules. Our specialists confirm the cause with you before recommending anything.
A confirmation is on its way to your inbox.
New programme dates, free tools and short insights on procurement, safeguards, M&E and public-sector delivery. No spam; unsubscribe any time.
By subscribing you agree to receive our newsletter. Privacy policy